상세정보

That the topic ofdesign review is somehow trou­ My biases are clearfrom the start: I am among blesome is probably one thing all readers can those who believe that, despite all signals to the contrary, the physical structure of our environ­ agree on. Beyond this, however, I suspect pros­ pects of consensus are dim. Differing opinions ment can be managed, and that controlling it is on the subject likely range from those desiring the key to the ameliorationofnumerous problems control tothosedesiringfreedom. Saysonecamp: confronting society today. I believe that design our physical and natural environments are going can solve a host ofproblems, and that the design to hell in a hand basket. Says the other: design of the physical environment does influence be­ review boards are only as good as their members; havior. more often than not their interventions produce Clearly, this is a perspective that encompasses mediocre architecture. more than one building at a time and demands As a town planner and architect, I am sympa­ that each building understand its place in a larger thetic to the full range of sentiment. Perhaps a context-the city. Indeed, anyone proposing discussion of these two concepts-control and physical solutions to urban problems is designing freedom-and their differences would now be or, as may seem more often the case, destroying useful. But let me instead suggest that both posi­ the city.

That the topic ofdesign review is somehow trou­ My biases are clearfrom the start: I am among blesome is probably one thing all readers can those who believe that, despite all signals to the contrary, the physical structure of our environ­ agree on. Beyond this, however, I suspect pros­ pects of consensus are dim. Differing opinions ment can be managed, and that controlling it is on the subject likely range from those desiring the key to the ameliorationofnumerous problems control tothosedesiringfreedom. Saysonecamp: confronting society today. I believe that design our physical and natural environments are going can solve a host ofproblems, and that the design to hell in a hand basket. Says the other: design of the physical environment does influence be­ review boards are only as good as their members; havior. more often than not their interventions produce Clearly, this is a perspective that encompasses mediocre architecture. more than one building at a time and demands As a town planner and architect, I am sympa­ that each building understand its place in a larger thetic to the full range of sentiment. Perhaps a context-the city. Indeed, anyone proposing discussion of these two concepts-control and physical solutions to urban problems is designing freedom-and their differences would now be or, as may seem more often the case, destroying useful. But let me instead suggest that both posi­ the city.

정보제공 :

CONTENTS
Foreword / Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk(Principal, DPZ Architects, Inc., Miami, FL) = ⅶ
Preface / Wolfgang F. E. Preiser(University of Cincinnati) = xv
Contributors = xix
Introduction: The Debate on Design Review / Brenda Case Scheer(University of Cincinnati) = 1
Ⅰ ISSUES IN DESIGN REVIEW
 1 Democracy and Design / John Delafons(University of Reading, United Kingdom) = 13
 2 Reviewing New Design in Historic Districts / Ellen Beasley(Historic Preservation Consultant, Houston, Texas) = 20
 3 Can the Process of Architectural Design Review Withstand Legal Scrutiny? / Richard Tseng-yu Lai(Arizona State University at Tempe) = 31
 4 The Abuse of Discretionary Power / Brian W. Blaesser, Esq.(Rudnick & Wolfe, Attorneys, Chicago) = 42
 5 Design Review and Conservation in England: Historical Development and Contemporary Relationships / John V. Punter(University of Strathclyde, Glasgow) = 51
 6 Design Review from the Inside / Bernard J. Frieden(Massachusetts Institute of Technology) = 62
ⅡDESIGN REVIEW IN PRACTICE
 7 Discovering Suburban Values through Design Review / Gary Hack(Massachusetts Institute of Technology) = 75
 8 Design Review Comes to Phoenix / Grady Gammage, Jr.(Gammage & Burnham Attorneys at Law, Phoenix, Arizona) = 85
 9 Santa Fe Styles and Townscapes: The Search for Authenticity / Harry Moul(Planner, City of Santa Fe) = 95
 10 Transforming Suburbia: The Case Study of Bellevue, Washington / Mark L. Hinshaw(Urban Design Consultant, Bellevue, Washington) = 111
 11 Discretionary Design Review: Shaping Downtown Cincinnati / Hayden May Miami(University of Ohio) = 119
 12 The New England Life: Design Review in Boston / Allan D. Wallis(University of Colorado at Denver) = 133
Ⅲ CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES OF DESIGN REVIEW
 13 Place-Making and Design Review / Michael Hough(York University, Toronto) = 147
 14 Carbuncles, Columns, and Pyramids: Lay and Expert Evaluations of Contextual Design Strategies / Linda N. Groat(University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) = 156
 15 Local Architectural Language and Contextualism / Anthony D. Radford(University of Adelaide, Australia) = 165
 16 Disciplinary Society and the Myth of Aesthetic Justice / Patrick J. Pouler(Architect, Santa Barbara, California) = 175
 17 Private Design Review in Edge City / David J. Baab(Planning Consultant, Irvine, California) = 187
 18 Battery Park City: An American Dream of Urbanism / Francis P. Russell(University of Cincinnati) = 197
Epilogue / Witold Rybczynski(University of Pennsylvania) = 210
Index = 213