| 000 | 00000cam u2200205 a 4500 | |
| 001 | 000000769027 | |
| 005 | 20240130092825 | |
| 008 | 990728s2000 caua b s001 0 eng | |
| 010 | ▼a 99043091 | |
| 020 | ▼a 0520219104 (cloth : alk. paper) | |
| 040 | ▼a DLC ▼c DLC ▼d UKM ▼d MUQ ▼d 211009 | |
| 043 | ▼a e-gx--- | |
| 049 | 1 | ▼l 111198439 |
| 050 | 0 0 | ▼a NA1086.M8 ▼b R68 2000 |
| 082 | 0 0 | ▼a 720/.943/36409045 ▼2 21 |
| 090 | ▼a 720.943 ▼b R813m | |
| 100 | 1 | ▼a Rosenfeld, Gavriel David, ▼d 1967- ▼0 AUTH(211009)161382. |
| 245 | 1 0 | ▼a Munich and memory : ▼b architecture, monuments, and the legacy of the Third Reich / ▼c Gavriel D. Rosenfeld. |
| 260 | ▼a Berkeley : ▼b University of California Press, ▼c c2000. | |
| 300 | ▼a xxiii, 433 p. : ▼b ill. ; ▼c 27 cm. | |
| 440 | 0 | ▼a Weimar and now ; ▼v 22 |
| 504 | ▼a Includes bibliographical references and index. | |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Architecture ▼z Germany ▼z Munich ▼y 20th century. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Architecture ▼x Conservation and restoration ▼z Germany ▼z Munich. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Reconstruction (1939-1951) ▼z Germany ▼z Munich. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a National socialism and architecture ▼z Germany ▼z Munich. |
| 651 | 0 | ▼a Munich (Germany) ▼x Buildings, structures, etc. |
소장정보
| No. | 소장처 | 청구기호 | 등록번호 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | 소장처 중앙도서관/서고7층/ | 청구기호 720.943 R813m | 등록번호 111198439 | 도서상태 대출가능 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
컨텐츠정보
책소개
Munich, notorious in recent history as the capital of the Nazi movement, is the site of Gavriel Rosenfeld's stimulating inquiry into the German collective memory of the Third Reich. Rosenfeld shows, with the aid of a wealth of photographs, how the city's urban form developed after 1945 in direct reflection of its inhabitants' evolving memory of the Second World War and the Nazi dictatorship.
In the second half of the twentieth century, the German people's struggle to come to terms with the legacy of Nazism has dramatically shaped nearly all dimensions of their political, social, and cultural life. The area of urban development and the built environment, little explored until now, offers visible evidence of the struggle. By examining the ways in which the people of Munich reconstructed the ruins of their historic buildings, created new works of architecture, dealt with surviving Nazi buildings, and erected new monuments to commemorate the horrors of the recent past, Rosenfeld identifies a spectrum of competing memories of the Nazi experience.
Munich’s postwar development was the subject of constant controversy, pitting representatives of contending aesthetic and mnemonic positions against one another in the heated battle to shape the city’s urban form. Examining the debates between traditionalists, modernists, postmodernists, and critical preservationists, Rosenfeld shows that the memory of Nazism in Munich has never been "repressed" but has rather been defined by constant dissension and evolution. On balance, however, he concludes that Munich came to embody in its urban form a conservative view of the past that was inclined to diminish local responsibility for the Third Reich.
In the second half of the twentieth century, the German people's struggle to come to terms with the legacy of Nazism has dramatically shaped nearly all dimensions of their political, social, and cultural life. The area of urban development and the built environment, little explored until now, offers visible evidence of the struggle. By examining the ways in which the people of Munich reconstructed the ruins of their historic buildings, created new works of architecture, dealt with surviving Nazi buildings, and erected new monuments to commemorate the horrors of the recent past, Rosenfeld identifies a spectrum of competing memories of the Nazi experience.
Munich’s postwar development was the subject of constant controversy, pitting representatives of contending aesthetic and mnemonic positions against one another in the heated battle to shape the city’s urban form. Examining the debates between traditionalists, modernists, postmodernists, and critical preservationists, Rosenfeld shows that the memory of Nazism in Munich has never been "repressed" but has rather been defined by constant dissension and evolution. On balance, however, he concludes that Munich came to embody in its urban form a conservative view of the past that was inclined to diminish local responsibility for the Third Reich.
정보제공 :
목차
CONTENTS List of Illustrations = ⅸ Preface = xvii Acknowledgments = xxi Introduction = 1 PART ONE. RESTORATION OR RENEWAL? 1945-1958 = 2 1. Destruction, Reconstruction, and Mourning = 15 2. Architecture, City Planning, and the Memory of Nazism = 49 3. Memory and Urban Denazification = 76 4. Monuments and Memory = 107 PART TWO. MODERNISM, 1958-1975 = 143 5. Modernism, Populist Historic Preservation, and the Memory of Nazism = 147 6. Populist Historic Preservation, Revisionist Reconstruction, and Mourning = 175 7. Nazi Architecture: Normalization and Its Discontents = 199 8. The Decline of the Monument = 210 PART THREE. POSTMODERNISM, 1975-2000 = 229 9. The Postmodern City and the Recontestation of Memory = 233 10. The Architecture of the Third Reich: Between Normalization, Demolition, and Critical Preservation = 259 11. The Return of the Monument = 280 Conclusion = 306 Appendix = 315 Abbreviations = 319 Notes = 321 Bibliography = 399 Index = 423
