| 000 | 00000cam u2200205 a 4500 | |
| 001 | 000045890446 | |
| 005 | 20161214155652 | |
| 008 | 161214s2015 nyu b 001 0 eng d | |
| 010 | ▼a 2014040617 | |
| 020 | ▼a 9780415885478 (hbk) | |
| 020 | ▼z 9781315714899 (ebk) | |
| 035 | ▼a (KERIS)REF000017603517 | |
| 040 | ▼a DLC ▼b eng ▼c DLC ▼e rda ▼d DLC ▼d 211009 | |
| 050 | 0 0 | ▼a K5210 ▼b .B76 2015 |
| 082 | 0 0 | ▼a 345/.02501 ▼2 23 |
| 084 | ▼a 345.02501 ▼2 DDCK | |
| 090 | ▼a 345.02501 ▼b B877h | |
| 100 | 1 | ▼a Brown, Alexander, ▼d 1974 December 27-. |
| 245 | 1 0 | ▼a Hate speech law : ▼b a philosophical examination / ▼c Alexander Brown. |
| 260 | ▼a New York, NY : ▼b Routledge, ▼c c2015. | |
| 300 | ▼a xvi, 362 p. ; ▼c 24 cm. | |
| 490 | 1 | ▼a Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy ; ▼v 67 |
| 504 | ▼a Includes bibliographical references (p. 321-345) and index. | |
| 505 | 0 | ▼a Introduction -- Ten clusters of laws/regulations/codes that constrain uses of hate speech -- Principles of basic morality -- Principles of personal development -- Principles of civic morality -- Principles of cultural diversity -- Principles of political morality -- Principles of balance -- Principia juris -- Toward a theory of principled compromise -- Conclusion. |
| 520 | ▼a "Hate speech law can be found throughout the world. But it is also the subject of numerous principled arguments, both for and against. These principles invoke a host of morally relevant features (e.g., liberty, health, autonomy, security, non-subordination, the absence of oppression, human dignity, the discovery of truth, the acquisition of knowledge, self-realization, human excellence, civic dignity, cultural diversity and choice, recognition of cultural identity, intercultural dialogue, participation in democratic self-government, being subject only to legitimate rule) and practical considerations (e.g., efficacy, the least restrictive alternative, chilling effects). The book develops and then critically examines these various principled arguments. It also attempts to de-homogenize hate speech law into different clusters of laws/regulations/codes that constrain uses of hate speech, so as to facilitate a more nuanced examination of the principled arguments. Finally, it argues that it is morally fitting for judicial and legislative judgments about the overall warrant of hate speech law to reflect principled compromise. Principled compromise is characterized not merely by compromise over matters of principled concern but also by compromise which is itself governed by ideals of moral duty or civic virtue (e.g., reciprocity, equality, and mutual respect)"-- ▼c Provided by publisher. | |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Hate speech ▼x Law and legislation. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Hate speech ▼x Philosophy. |
| 830 | 0 | ▼a Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy ; ▼v 67. |
| 945 | ▼a KLPA |
소장정보
| No. | 소장처 | 청구기호 | 등록번호 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | 소장처 중앙도서관/법학도서실(법학도서관 지하1층)/ | 청구기호 345.02501 B877h | 등록번호 111764823 (3회 대출) | 도서상태 대출가능 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
컨텐츠정보
책소개
Hate speech law can be found throughout the world. But it is also the subject of numerous principled arguments, both for and against. These principles invoke a host of morally relevant features (e.g., liberty, health, autonomy, security, non-subordination, the absence of oppression, human dignity, the discovery of truth, the acquisition of knowledge, self-realization, human excellence, civic dignity, cultural diversity and choice, recognition of cultural identity, intercultural dialogue, participation in democratic self-government, being subject only to legitimate rule) and practical considerations (e.g., efficacy, the least restrictive alternative, chilling effects). The book develops and then critically examines these various principled arguments. It also attempts to de-homogenize hate speech law into different clusters of laws/regulations/codes that constrain uses of hate speech, so as to facilitate a more nuanced examination of the principled arguments. Finally, it argues that it is morally fitting for judicial and legislative judgments about the overall warrant of hate speech law to reflect principled compromise. Principled compromise is characterized not merely by compromise over matters of principled concern but also by compromise which is itself governed by ideals of moral duty or civic virtue (e.g., reciprocity, equality, and mutual respect).
The Open Access version of this book, available at https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714899, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.
This book will take a long-overdue multidisciplinary approach to hate speech law, bringing together legal, political, social and philosophical lines of analysis and argument.
정보제공 :
목차
Introduction Ten clusters of laws/regulations/codes that constrain uses of hate speech Principles of basic morality Principles of personal development Principles of civic morality Principles of cultural diversity Principles of political morality Principles of balance Principia juris Toward a theory of principled compromise Conclusion.