HOME > 상세정보

상세정보

Interdisciplinarity in technology assessment : implementation and its chances and limits

Interdisciplinarity in technology assessment : implementation and its chances and limits (1회 대출)

자료유형
단행본
개인저자
Decker, M. (Michael).
서명 / 저자사항
Interdisciplinarity in technology assessment : implementation and its chances and limits / M. Decker (ed.).
발행사항
Berlin ;   New York :   Springer,   c2001.  
형태사항
xx, 215 p. : ill. ; 25 cm.
총서사항
Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung ;Bd. 11
ISBN
3540427929 (hd.bd.)
일반주기
Contributions to this book originated from a conference organized by the Europäische Akademie, Sept. 21-23, 2000.  
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references.
일반주제명
Technology assessment --Congresses.
000 00000cam u2200205 a 4500
001 000045844514
005 20150918101528
008 150916s2001 gw a b 100 0 eng d
010 ▼a 2002511010
020 ▼a 3540427929 (hd.bd.)
035 ▼a (KERIS)REF000006752234
040 ▼a OHX ▼c OHX ▼d UMC ▼d DLC ▼d 211009
050 0 0 ▼a T174.5 ▼b .I58 2001
082 0 0 ▼a 303.48/3 ▼2 23
084 ▼a 303.483 ▼2 DDCK
090 ▼a 303.483 ▼b I612
245 0 0 ▼a Interdisciplinarity in technology assessment : ▼b implementation and its chances and limits / ▼c M. Decker (ed.).
260 ▼a Berlin ; ▼a New York : ▼b Springer, ▼c c2001.
300 ▼a xx, 215 p. : ▼b ill. ; ▼c 25 cm.
490 1 ▼a Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung ; ▼v Bd. 11
500 ▼a Contributions to this book originated from a conference organized by the Europäische Akademie, Sept. 21-23, 2000.
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references.
650 0 ▼a Technology assessment ▼v Congresses.
700 1 ▼a Decker, M. ▼q (Michael).
830 0 ▼a Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung ; ▼v Bd. 11.
945 ▼a KLPA

소장정보

No. 소장처 청구기호 등록번호 도서상태 반납예정일 예약 서비스
No. 1 소장처 중앙도서관/서고6층/ 청구기호 303.483 I612 등록번호 111741940 (1회 대출) 도서상태 대출가능 반납예정일 예약 서비스 B M

컨텐츠정보

책소개

Technology Assessment processes can be taken as a paradigm for interdisciplinary research. It is expected that interdisciplinary Technology Assessment is able to find solutions for actual sociopolitical problems that go beyond those expected from one individual scientific discipline alone. The common notion, that for tasks like this different disciplinary perspectives should be brought together, confronts the fact that there is no common notion on how interdisciplinary research should be done. In the present volume European experts of Technology Assessment present their perspectives on interdisciplinary research. Many focus on methodology, policy consulting, and participation of stakeholders, non-experts and citizens. Others present concrete case studies concerning climate change and health care. Each contribution is commented by an other scientist. The result is a discussion-like examination of the connection between interdisciplinarity and the main subjects of Technology Assesment.

Technology Assessment processes can be taken as a paradigm for interdisciplinary research. It is expected that interdisciplinary Technology Assessment is able to find solutions for actual sociopolitical problems that go beyond those expected from one individual scientific discipline alone. The common notion, that for tasks like this different disciplinary perspectives should be brought together, confronts the fact that there is no common notion on how interdisciplinary research should be done. In the present volume European experts of Technology Assessment present their perspectives on interdisciplinary research. Many focus on methodology, policy consulting, and participation of stakeholders, non-experts and citizens. Others present concrete case studies concerning climate change and health care. Each contribution is commented by an other scientist. The result is a discussion-like examination of the connection between interdisciplinarity and the main subjects of Technology Assesment.

New feature

Technology Assessment processes can be taken as a paradigm for interdisciplinary research. It is expected that interdisciplinary Technology Assessment is able to find solutions for actual sociopolitical problems that go beyond those expectable from one individual scientific discipline alone. The common notion that for tasks like this different disciplinary perspectives should be brought together confronts the fact that there is no common notion on how interdisciplinary research should be done. In the present volume of the series "Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung" European experts of Technology Assessment present their perspectives on interdisciplinary research. They focus on methodology, policy consulting, and participation of stakeholders, laypersons and citizens or present concrete case studies concerning climate change and health care. Each contribution is commented by an other scientist. The result is a discussion-like examination of the connection between interdisciplinarity and the main subjects of Technology Assessment. This makes the book worth reading not only for experts in interdisciplinary research and policy consulting, but also for those who are interested in the ongoing discussion about methodology in European Technology Assessment.


정보제공 : Aladin

목차

I Methodology of Technology Assessment.- 1 Participatory Technology Assessment. Some Critical Questions.- 3 Business as Usual: On the Prospects of Normality in Scientific Research.- 4 Rational Technology Assessment as Interdisciplinary Research.- 5 To assess rationality before anything else. A remark on the legitimacy of Rational Technology Assessment.- II Technology Assessment as Policy Consulting.- 6 Parliament, Paradox and Policy.- 7 The Politics of Technology Assessment.- 9 The Role of Scientific Input and Public Participation for Technology Assessment.- IV Case Studies.- 10 The Ethics of Technology Assessment in Health Care.- 11 Transition Management: a promising policy perspective.- 12 The Inclusion of Stakeholder Perspectives in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change.


정보제공 : Aladin

관련분야 신착자료

김지연 (2026)
한국. 특허전략개발원 (2025)
한국. 특허전략개발원 (2025)
Nelson, John P., (Professor of public policy) (2025)
더밀크 (2026)
정위용 (2025)