![Scientific peer review [electronic resource] : guidelines for informative peer review](https://image.aladin.co.kr/product/11923/21/cover/3658199148_2.jpg)
| 000 | 00000cam u2200205 a 4500 | |
| 001 | 000045989524 | |
| 005 | 20190711150143 | |
| 006 | m d | |
| 007 | cr | |
| 008 | 190708s2017 gw ob 000 0 eng d | |
| 020 | ▼a 9783658199142 | |
| 020 | ▼a 9783658199159 (eBook) | |
| 040 | ▼a 211009 ▼c 211009 ▼d 211009 | |
| 050 | 4 | ▼a QH301-705 |
| 082 | 0 4 | ▼a 808.02 ▼2 23 |
| 084 | ▼a 808.02 ▼2 DDCK | |
| 090 | ▼a 808.02 | |
| 100 | 1 | ▼a Starck, J. Matthias. |
| 245 | 1 0 | ▼a Scientific peer review ▼h [electronic resource] : ▼b guidelines for informative peer review / ▼c J. Matthias Starck. |
| 260 | ▼a Wiesbaden : ▼b Springer Spektrum, ▼c c2017. | |
| 300 | ▼a 1 online resource (ix, 59 p.). | |
| 490 | 1 | ▼a Essentials, ▼x 2197-6708 |
| 500 | ▼a Title from e-Book title page. | |
| 504 | ▼a Includes bibliographical references. | |
| 505 | 0 | ▼a Essence of Scientific Communication -- Why Peer Review? -- Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process -- Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process -- Reviewer Recognition -- Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict. |
| 520 | ▼a J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement. Contents Essence of Scientific Communication Why Peer Review? Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process Reviewer Recognition Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict Target Groups Advanced PhD students and postdocs from biomedical research and natural science fields who received their first peer review requests and now seek advice and guidance Researchers from all fields of science and all degrees of experience who wish to improve and develop their methodological approach to peer review The Author Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich. | |
| 530 | ▼a Issued also as a book. | |
| 538 | ▼a Mode of access: World Wide Web. | |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Academic writing. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Technical writing. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Peer review. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Scholarly publishing. |
| 830 | 0 | ▼a Essentials. |
| 856 | 4 0 | ▼u https://oca.korea.ac.kr/link.n2s?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9 |
| 945 | ▼a KLPA | |
| 991 | ▼a E-Book(소장) |
소장정보
| No. | 소장처 | 청구기호 | 등록번호 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | 소장처 중앙도서관/e-Book 컬렉션/ | 청구기호 CR 808.02 | 등록번호 E14015066 | 도서상태 대출불가(열람가능) | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
컨텐츠정보
책소개
J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement.
New feature
J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement.
Contents
- Essence of Scientific Communication
- Why Peer Review?
- Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process
- Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process
- Reviewer Recognition
- Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict
Target Groups
- Advanced PhD students and postdocs from biomedical research and natural science fields who received their first peer review requests and now seek advice and guidance
- Researchers from all fields of science and all degrees of experience who wish to improve and develop their methodological approach to peer review
The Author
Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.
정보제공 :
목차
Essence of Scientific Communication Why Peer Review? Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process Reviewer Recognition Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict.